The NAHC Oversight Lawsuit: What Does The Court Ruling Mean?

Yesterday, December 22, 2014, the federal court ruled that the U.S. Department of Labor violated the plain language of the Fair Labor Standards ACT (FLSA) with its regulation that excluded third-party employers from application of the “comprehensive services” and “live-in domestic services” overtime exemptions. Homecare companies are considered third-party employers. Homecare workers employed by the direct consumer of the care (or his/her family) are the only parties that could have used the exemptions under the rule that was invalidated by the court. This does not change any state laws that already limit the exemptions or their application.

Although the decision is a big win for homecare, much remains to be done to fully preserve the overtime exemption for companionship services and live-in domestic services. NAHC is expected to provide more updates. Stay tuned to the HMS blog as we receive more information.

Click here to see our previous blog regarding the rule.

Click here to see an article form NAHC regarding the lawsuit.

Advertisements

One thought on “The NAHC Oversight Lawsuit: What Does The Court Ruling Mean?

  1. Pingback: Monday Morning Recap | hmsabc

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s